Thus, we can make a number of predictions regarding the function of a dedicated social memory system. We would expect this system to respond differentially based on intentionality such that intentionally formed impressions would contribute to encoding success differently than incidentally formed impressions. Explicit effort supports the ability to recognize emotional facial expressions, although implicit conditions reveal impairments in patients with lesions to the orbitofrontal cortex (M. L. Willis, Palermo, Burke, McGrillen, & Miller, 2010).
Elements such as setting, timing, sensory cues, and emotional intensity all play a role in shaping how the memory is stored. Understanding the psychology behind these experiences helps explain why some proposals feel unforgettable while others fade more quickly, even if both are meaningful in their own way. People will quickly judge others’ trustworthiness, physical strength, and intentions to do harm based on subtle facial and vocal cues. These traits may differ slightly across cultures; for example, some studies have found that Chinese societies form first impressions based on competence (i.e., perceptions of intelligence and social status) rather than on physical strength. Profile photographs function as portraits, and research on portrait-based impressions found that evaluations formed from a single photograph predicted how people felt about that individual after a real interaction a month later.
After all, natural selection should have weeded out this behavior if it wasn’t beneficial. When we compare people’s snap judgments of character with objective forms of measurement, such as personality tests, we find the accuracy of our first impressions is better than chance. In other words, we often judge correctly, but there are still plenty of times when we’re completely wrong.
Eager To Learn About How Behavioral Science Can Help Your Organization?
Todorov, Mandisodza, Goren, and Hall (2005) reported a demonstration of just how important such initial impressions can be. These researchers showed to participants pairs of political candidates who had run https://www.quora.com/What-makes-Wingtalks-different-from-other-apps against each other in previous elections for the U.S. Participants saw only the faces of the candidates, and they saw them in some cases for only one second.
- As noted above, babyfaceness varies with gender, and the greater babyfaceness of women contributes to impressions of female faces as warmer and less powerful than male faces (Friedman & Zebrowitz, 1992).
- But the truth is, most of us underestimate the sheer speed and impact of these snap judgments.
- A smile and just the right amount of eye contact can help you effectively convey information during first impressions and long after.
- Crossed arms, contracted posture, and averted gaze all trigger automatic negative inferences that your words will have to work hard to overcome.
- Who we approach, who we avoid, who we introduce to others, these decisions cascade from first impressions, shaping the architecture of our relationships in ways that rarely get traced back to their origin.
The intuitions that guide our social interactions are largely innate, but that doesn’t mean we’re powerless to overcome them. If we understand how our intuitions work, we can avoid pitfalls and guide them to our advantage. This means skillfully manipulating our own facial features to make the right first impression in others, while guarding ourselves against intuitive judgments that may lead us astray. Psychologist Leslie Zebrowitz of Brandeis University studies the facial information we use to judge other people. Although first impressions are notoriously prone to error, we just can’t stop ourselves from making them—and it only takes a tenth of a second to form a judgment about another person’s character, even from a still photograph.
Slowing your breath deliberately before a high-stakes first meeting has measurable effects on vocal tone and posture. People are presented with contradictory evidence about someone they’ve already formed an impression of, and they discount it. Not consciously, they’re usually confident they’re being fair. But the initial judgment restructures how incoming information is processed. The cues people attend to, the interpretations they draw, and the norms that govern appropriate first-encounter behavior all vary significantly across cultural contexts. The brain doesn’t evaluate people from scratch each time.
First impressions activate something closer to a self-fulfilling prophecy. If you’ve decided someone is warm and trustworthy, you’ll act warmer toward them, which tends to elicit warmth back. The initial impression generates the very behavior that confirms it. Research on social cognition consistently finds that people evaluate strangers on warmth first and competence second, yet most people spend far more effort projecting competence. A firm handshake and sharp suit may matter far less in the first seconds of a meeting than a genuine, unguarded smile.
Start by implementing 3-5 techniques that feel most natural to you. Practice them until they become second nature, then gradually incorporate the others. Before your next interview, review this list and identify the specific psychological strategies you’ll employ. The solution isn’t to become robotic or overly controlled. Instead, practice calm, open body language that signals confidence and engagement. Sit slightly forward to show interest, maintain natural eye contact (looking at the bridge of the nose works if direct eye contact feels uncomfortable), and keep your hands visible and relatively still.
Shared activities, mutual acquaintances, common LinkedIn connections—and don’t forget about the power of a sincere Duchenne smile. Remember, you’re doing this to work around more primitive (and therefore faster) areas of the brain, and the ultimate goal is to give someone the impression that it’s not only okay for the other person to get close to you, but that it would be well worth their time. Agreement was particularly strong on the traits of “sociable” and “responsible.” Because the results were unexpected, researchers paid little attention to them for two decades, but, beginning in the late 1980s, the work of that first study was extended and replicated. For one group of perceivers, short faces were the fair ones and long faces were unfair, while this perceptual experience was reversed for a second group, with average length faces described as average in fairness for both groups.
Such a possibility may account for the lack of memory differences across these conditions. Another possible explanation for differences from prior studies may lay in the different designs employed across studies. Though both used similar statements, our procedure was very different in that our study presented each face once, paired with a single unique sentence, whereas Mitchell’s (2004) study presented each face paired with 10 different sentences. Pooling impression information across multiple trials may decrease the importance of diagnostic information on any single trial when intentionally forming an impression of an individual. In contrast, “integrating meanings and/or evaluations of one target’s many behaviors is less likely to occur spontaneously and requires high levels of relevant chronic goals” (p. 333). This argument indicates that a more naturalistic setting, in which we form impressions based on a range of behaviors, is not ideal for forming a lasting, distinct first impression.
Your Psychological Advantage Starts Now
Although we can learn some things about others by observing their physical characteristics and their nonverbal behaviors, to really understand them we will eventually need to know their personality traits. Traits are important because they are the basic language by which we understand and communicate about people. When we talk about other people, we describe their traits. Our friends are “fun,” “creative,” and “crazy in a good way,” or “quiet,” “serious,” and “controlling.” The language of traits is a powerful one—indeed, there are over 18,000 trait terms in the English language.
It turns out that in most cases, our judgments are better predicted by mental averaging than by mental adding (Mills, 2007). What this means is that when you are telling someone about another person and you are trying to get him or her to like the person, you should say the most positive things that you know but leave out the more moderate (although also positive) information. The moderate information is more likely to dilute, rather than enhance, the more extreme information. Most people with whom we interact are not dangerous, nor do they create problems for us. In fact, when we are asked to rate how much we like complete strangers, we generally rate them positively (Sears, 1986).
These are the kinds of reactions that influence how confident we feel, our sense of belongingness or even social opportunities themselves. Meanwhile, people who don’t conform to conventional beauty standards are more likely to experience cold or less generous first reactions, even if they display identical behavior to conventionally attractive people. But if we do have an innate mechanism for making snap judgments of character from people’s faces, just how accurate is it?
Whether you’re working toward a career in journalism, speechwriting, or social media, our online program can empower you with the skills needed to convey your message clearly and profoundly. According to a 2026 SHRM study on hiring practices, candidates who provide value-added follow-up are 3.2 times more likely to receive offers than those who send generic thank-you notes or no follow-up at all. Research from Jobvite’s 2025 recruiting benchmark report found that 68% of hiring managers say a personalized thank-you message influences their final decision, yet fewer than 24% of candidates send one within the critical first 24 hours. This progression demonstrates thoughtful, growing interest rather than generic eagerness or desperation. It shows you’re evaluating them as much as they’re evaluating you – a hallmark of high-value candidates.
It also taught us about ‘primacy effects’ – the person who is first perceived as industrious and then as stubborn is judged more positively than one who is first perceived as stubborn. The present paper considers facial information as a source of first impressions. More specifically, it examines judgments about psychological qualities of strangers based on their neutral expression faces in static photographs. Taken together, these studies highlight the important role that the dmPFC plays in encoding first impressions. However, the conditions under which the region contributes to impression formation are little understood. Importantly, this study did not test memory, so it is unknown if these differential effects also influence the encoding of trait impressions into memory.
The cues that liars give off are quite faint, particularly when the lies that they are telling are not all that important. De Paulo and colleagues did find, however, that there were some reliable cues to deception. Most people are good and honest folk, and we expect them to tell the truth, and we tend to give them the benefit of the doubt (Buller, Stiff, & Burgoon, 1996; Gilbert, Krull, & Malone, 1990). In fact, people are more likely to expect deception when they view someone on a videotape than when they are having an interpersonal interaction with the person. It’s as if we expect the people who are right around us to be truthful (Bond & DePaulo, 2006).
The scent of freshly baked bread from the in-store bakery can stimulate appetite and lead to additional food purchases. Research indicates that upon entering, most shoppers instinctively turn right. Supermarkets capitalize on this by placing high-demand items or promotional products in this initial right-hand path, encouraging impulse buys from the moment you walk in. Boasting, bragging, and self-centeredness will only fly if you can deliver the goods, and even then, these things should be discovered rather than sold.
Each technique subtly reinforces the others, creating a powerful impression of you as the obvious choice for the position. The psychological principle at work here is called the recency effect. Your follow-up message becomes the last impression the interviewer has of you before making their decision, and recent memories carry disproportionate weight in evaluation.
This may augment the stereotypic impression that women are less dominant than men. Cultural wisdom instructs us not to ‘judge a book by its cover.’ This warning suggests both that our natural inclination is to judge people by their appearance and also that doing so will lead to erroneous first impressions. They are elicited by brief exposure, in some cases 100 ms or less (Willis & Todorov, 2006). Moreover, there is remarkable consensus in first impressions of traits like warmth and dominance, including cross-cultural agreement that extends even to indigenous people from the remote Bolivian rainforest (Zebrowitz et al., 2012).
